Vendor Comparison Tool

Compare vendors side by side with weighted scoring. Free, private and no sign-up.

Add your criteria and vendors below. Weighted scores and rankings appear instantly.

What is a vendor comparison matrix?

A vendor comparison matrix (also called a supplier evaluation matrix or weighted decision matrix) is a structured tool for comparing multiple suppliers against multiple criteria [citation:2]. Instead of choosing based on price alone, you score each vendor on factors that matter to your business — quality, delivery, support, total cost of ownership — then weight those factors by importance.

The result is a defensible, data-driven ranking that removes gut feel from the decision [citation:11].

Why weighted scoring matters

The cheapest quote is rarely the cheapest supplier. Hidden costs — freight, quality defects, delays, admin overhead — often make the lowest-price option the most expensive one over time [citation:8][citation:18]. Weighted scoring forces you to quantify the full picture: cost structure, reliability, quality, and strategic fit.

Research shows that procurement teams using structured evaluation matrices identify 15%+ cost savings compared to price-only decisions [citation:17].

How to use this tool

  1. Add criteria: Enter the factors that matter (price, quality, lead time, support).
  2. Set weights: Assign each criterion a weight percentage. Weights don't need to sum to exactly 100 — the tool normalizes them.
  3. Add vendors: Enter the names of the suppliers you're evaluating.
  4. Score each vendor: Rate each vendor 1–10 on each criterion.
  5. Read the ranking: The tool multiplies scores by weights and ranks vendors by total weighted score.

Common evaluation criteria

Weights vary by industry and priorities [citation:11]. Adjust to match your situation.

Frequently asked questions

What is a weighted vendor comparison?

It's a method where each evaluation criterion is assigned an importance weight, and each vendor is scored against those criteria. Final scores are weighted sums, producing an objective ranking [citation:2].

Should I use simple or weighted scoring?

Simple scoring (equal weights) works for quick decisions with similar vendors. Weighted scoring is better when criteria have different importance, or when trade-offs need to be explicit [citation:2].

What's the minimum number of vendors to compare?

Two is minimum; three or more gives better context. Most procurement teams shortlist 3–5 vendors for detailed evaluation [citation:11].

How many criteria should I use?

4–8 criteria is the sweet spot. Too few misses important factors; too many dilutes focus and makes scoring unwieldy.

Is anything I enter stored?

No. All calculations run in your browser.